Conveniently this tab has crashed when I was typing this (on another site). Having looked into the matter of circumcision (which is correlated with a covenant with Ya-hweh Yahuwshua) directly in scripture, Chapter 17 of 1 Mosheh "Genesis" and anything else having to do with circumcision ought to be decoded through computer-analyzed LXX. Look what this says!
Please log in to like, dislike, share and comment!
The Letter of Bar-Nâvíy (not "barnabas"...) 9:3-4 --
Therefore He has circumcised our ears, that when we might hear His Word we might believe,
4. for the circumcision in which they trusted is abolished. For He declared that circumcision was not of the flesh, but they transgressed because the evil envoy deluded them.
And look at what this says!
1 Mosheh 17:11,13-14 --
11. so you shall be circumcised of the flesh of your foreskin and it shall be for a sign of a covenant between Me and you.
13. one born of your house or purchased of your silver shall surely be circumcised, and it shall become My covenant by your flesh for an eternal covenant;
14. but an uncircumcised male, which is one who will not become circumcised of the flesh of his foreskin, even that life (néphesh) shall be cut off from its people, he has broken My covenant.”
Bar-Naviy makes it clear that our Circumcision is the heeding of Yahuwshua, the Word of Ya-hweh. The 415 men circumcised symbolized in Yahuwdiyth numerals Yahu on a gallows-cross. But the Masoretic and exoteric Septuagint, those sick scribes of satan, make the covenant sound like cutting off the male foreskin is required to enter the Kingdom/Royalty or else we are cut off.
"Yehuwthiy"-inspired 1 Mosheh 17 has "Ya-hweh" saying that circumcision is OF the flesh. Bar-Naviy has Ya-hweh saying that circumcision is NOT of the flesh, but this was SATAN, the evil envoy, who deluded people into trusting on the cutting of their FLESH for an *eternal covenant*. Somehow it slipped through the cracks in the other scriptural verses, which Bar-Naviy quotes, that circumcision is SPIRITUAL, of the heart and the ears, not of the foreskin of our penis. To this day there are "Yehuwthim" who are not only cutting their sons' foreskin for satan (so-called "adoshem", "hashem", "adonai", "g-d", "yehowah", etc.), but literally sucking that cut, bleeding flesh, and transmitting sexual infections, and harming the baby both biologically and supernaturally.
Yahuwshua may or may not have been materially circumcised when He was 8 days old on the Feast of Ingathering, the Last Great Day of the Feast of Tabernacles. But what does this Pure Feast have to do with cutting off the foreskin of the penis, let alone that of the Deliverer incarnate? He was far from safe from the reproach of the perverse "Yehuwthim" even if He may have supposedly done everything according to the material law of satan (the mighty one of 'Aharon), like fleshly circumcision, wearing blue-stripped tassels on the borders of His garment, not eating unclean animals, rigid observance of the Shabbath......
But wait! They got on His case that He was breaking their law. He never "became fruitful and multiplied", for He never materially married, was sexual, or procreated children materially. He was always a chaste, celibate, single, childless virgin. He cured, kneaded, worked on the Shabbath, for good. When we look at the etymology of the word "tsiytsíyth", typically translated "fringes" or "tassels", and the spiritual meaning of each element of the message (commandment) consistent with the totality of scripture, are they really strings attached to the "four corners" of our clothing like the legalist torahlaters are doing?
Did He make any big deal about consuming meats? Did He perform slaughter-offerings, entire burnt offerings ( "holocaust" ), grain offerings, drink offerings for Ya-hweh? What about usury, which the Judaized "Pentateuch/Torah" make it seem like we can have non-believing heathen masses, aliens, be in debt to us, but we cannot borrow, and owe, and be in debt to on another as brothers? Even the Orthodox-Catholic Church deemed usury immoral, you think the original Convocation would have been okay with that? Yet somehow Yahuwshua fulfilled the Law and the messages/commandments, and RESURRECTED from the house of the dead! His enemies hate Him so much, that they stonewall the incredulous and blind into thinking "Yehovah", "Yehowshua", "Yeshua", and "Iesous" are legitimate names and what the authors supposedly meant to write, and "Yâ-hwéh", and especially "Yâhuwshúa`" are "made up"!
Usually I'm a quiet, mild-mannered, reserved person who isn't prone to anger; but in a matter like this it makes me so full of righteous indignation and anger that the archons have used an impostor people to defile the name of the FATHER and of the SON, as well as the scriptures themselves, and now the establishment totally has people convinced that all these changes are legitimate. Yet this fuels the arguments of the detractors against the scriptures, that they are full of contradictions, that the scriptures and their doctrines have been used by an insidious religious cabal for social control and world domination, to justify what is wrong and unjust, that an evil force is behind these writings, or worse, that "Yahweh" is the devil himself. It brings nothing but confusion.
These scholarly academic types, even the Christians, are informed in their world view by material rationalistic thinking. The Christians are rather atheistic in their attitudes and discernment, that you'd almost be surprised that they believe in Christianity as the Truth that provides spiritual salvation. No, either personal supernatural experiences are downplayed as "anecdotal evidence" or as the mental illness or delusions of ignorant, self-interested people. Much of the experts, the professionals are quite elitist and snobbish, and haughty in their attitude, wielding an unprecedented power and authority over those who have not been seminary-trained, credentialed, or "lay people", forming a sort of de facto "academic dictatorship". Not to mention how much they conform to the traditions of the "Yehuwthim" in the matters of the name and the totality of scriptural theology.